Invitation

Revisiting My Heroes - Daniel Mezick

Revisiting My Heroes - Daniel Mezick

In June 2017 I wrote my first My Heroes segment on the blog and it was about David Hussman. It was before he passed away. Over the span of a few years, I shared a few more in this segment, but then it fell away. Not that I didn’t have any more heroes in the agile community, but I lost momentum reflecting on and sharing about them.

Well, it’s the Summer of 2022 and I’d like to revisit my agile hero’s series again. At least for a short time.

The agile world and community need members like Dan Mezick. I sometimes think of Dan as the Don Quixote of agile influencers, authors, coaches, and consultants.

Dan’s focus seems to be largely on three immensely important things in our community –

  • Organizational culture change,

  • Invitation-based Leadership, and

  • Invitation-based Agile adoption.

And in support of these ideas, he’s also had an ongoing crusade of sorts against the agile industrial complex.

Invitation vs. Imposition - Does it have to be such a STARK Delineation?

I’ve been reading Dan Mezick’s posts lately and he seems to be increasing his passion and push about invitation. I guess that makes sense. He IS a thought leader in this space and, as such, he probably needs to keep trying to inspire others towards this way of thinking.

But each time I read one of his posts, it rings “extreme” to me. Very stark and binary. That is – one either imposes or invites. With seemingly nothing in between. With imposition being Darth Vader to invitations’ Luke Skywalker.

For example, in a recent series of posts, he seemed to rail against the existing community of agile coaches, trainers, and pundits that very few (none) of them are pushing invitation. And challenging them as to why.

It even seemed as if he was judging all of them (us, me) in this. That if you didn’t publicly espouse invitation the way Dan is doing it, that you were somehow not doing your duty or were less of a coach. Or you had succumbed to the Dark Side.

I’m paraphrasing here, but I think I’ve honestly captured the essence of it.

A Recent Discussion

I recently saw a discussion initiated by Amr Elssamadisy. It seemed quite thoughtful to me and it resonated with my own experience.

Here’s a link to that post and the comments.

I considered it something in the “gray area” between imposition and invitation. Something that a thoughtful leader could navigate.

Amr directly asked Dan about his thoughts. And Dan shared them via a series of four comments.

I thought that Dan struck too binary of a stance in his reaction to Amr. That is, I’m wondering if he could be more moderated and open-minded to the possibilities of something positive between invitation and imposition? That is, are there circumstances where what Amr suggests might work? And what might those conditions be? 

What I’m really pushing on is the starkness of his view.

I also wrote a blog a while back that tried to focus a bit on the space between invitation and imposition. You can read it here.

Wrapping Up

In the end, I think Dan might be a tad too extreme. Sure, his ideas are:

  • Thoughtful;

  • Seem to be well-grounded in research;

  • Well-intentioned;

  • And often invitation is a powerful approach to real change.

But I don’t see them resonating in the real-world that leaders face today. And I don’t see sufficient trust in solid leadership to strike the right balance. Sure, many can’t do it effectively. But in my experience, many leaders can and they can inspire the results that Dan speaks to.

So, from my perspective, I’m publicly saying two things:

  1. An invitation is a powerful and often the best stance to create the space for agile change.

  2. BUT, it’s not the only approach. That is – the space in between can often be the way to go…

Amr, thanks for your insights. Dan, thank you for pushing us to consider better approaches!

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

If you build it, they will come

Or a corollary to the title,

If you respectfully invite your teams, your groups, and your organizations into an agile way of operating, they will come.

In this case, invitation over imposition.

I’ve written about this notion quite a few times before. You see, I believe the world of agile (Business Agility, DevOps, going Agile, Scaling, etc.) is rife with imposition. Folks are being TOLD to be agile and they’re struggling with how to operate in that prescriptive, demanding ecosystem.

And largely, it’s not working. They’re not instantaneously becoming agile. Imagine that?

It turns out that a much more effective stance is inviting folks. But it’s scary, because what if they don’t or won’t come? Then what do we do?

How to make the transition?

Effectively making this transition is a mindset shift for most of us. Particularly for those in leadership positions. So, it’s much easier said than done. And we’re only done when we’re actually walking the talk of invitation. So, we need tools and techniques that help us to open the space for the invitation.

There’s a wonderful opportunity coming up on Tampa Florida called the Open Leadership Symposium that is a gathering of folks who will be exploring this and other notions of changing our leadership approach towards agility. It’s being held on February 4th – 6th.

You can find more information about it here - https://openleadershipnetwork.com/events/2020-tampa/

And, if you use Discount Code: BOBGALEN, you'll get 50% off attending one, two, or all three days of the event. 

I’m going and I hope to see Y’all there as well.

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.