Stance Dance

Coaching versus Telling

Coaching versus Telling

Marcia Reynolds posted this recently on LinkedIn

Many leaders think it is easier to give advice than to take the time to coach others to find their own solutions. They don’t realize they are wasting time instead of saving it.
When you tell people what to do, your primarily access their short-term memory in their cognitive brain, where learning is least effective. They either comply or resist, and often do not remember the details of what you shared.
This is why we refrain from telling people what to do in coaching. We activate their creative, generative brain! Creative insights are lasting, not temporary, and often build confidence in acting on new ideas. Change is sustainable, and you cultivate agile thinking and performing!
Save this post to refer back to when you need it. ❤️

That I’d like to examine from two perspectives—

Leaning In & Out as an Agile Coach

Leaning In & Out as an Agile Coach

My friend and colleague Joel Bancroft-Connors have been doing a fantastic job contributing to the Agile Coaching Growth Wheel community project sponsored by the Scrum Alliance.

While I heavily reference the Wheel in my Extraordinarily Badass Agile Coaching book, I haven’t been paying detailed attention to its ongoing evolution.

One area I noticed the volunteer team added was to group specific competencies into categories of neutral versus active. And, when someone asked me about them, I hadn’t a clue what was intended. Here’s a question/answer dialogue that provides some additional context—

When asked—

What is meant by distinguishing between “neutral” and “active” competencies on the Agile Coaching Growth Wheel self-assessment guide?